The other day I was listening to the news while driving my kids to the doctor’s office. Let’s not forget to mention that I was spiking a fever of over 101 and had not had a full night sleep in nearly a week and I had two sick kids in the car. I thought I was hallucinating what I was hearing until later that night I saw the same coverage.
A school district in Oakland, California has just launched its first teaching curriculum of “gender diversity” as early as Kindergarten. I went online and reviewed the curriculum. It was a bit puzzling the comparison of the animal kingdom (fish and reptiles) they used to make the point about “gender diversity”; none of it made sense to me. The reason those species change gender and/or transgender is to keep the species in existence. I don’t see how teaching that concept really reinforces pro-tolerance and ” human gender diversity”. That is like comparing apples to oranges. The reason people are gay or transgender has nothing to do with saving a species.
However, this segment is not about pro or against gender diversity; this is about our schools doing the jobs of what should be done at home and since it is not being done at home (by a very small minority),they are taking on the responsibility. The problem is that not only are they doing a poor job at taking on the job, they are losing sight that the Chinese are passing us by in the science and math department. So while they are going to space and forming new ground breaking patents we will be well versed in the ill-informed information on hermaphrodite amphibians.
Is spending the VERY limited resources we have on education, teaching “gender diversity” in the early elementary years really going to solve our problem of bullying, lack of tolerance and hate? The sad thing is we will never be able to eradicate that from the human race. Is this in the early classroom really going to set up our kids for success in competing with the dog eat dog socio-economic world?
As you know I am not a fan of the Chinese government, they are not the beacon of good will and humanity towards mankind, but the one thing they understand is that knowledge and discipline is power. We have such a cutting edge on true balance of both discipline with good boundaries and good education, but we fail to no longer combine them and that is to our losing race to countries like China.
Kids no longer have a healthy respect and sovereign fear of their educators. Not because the educators have grown soft, but the educators are govern by out of touch legislation and administration that no longer allow the educator to hold true and meaningful consequences.
I have several friends that teach, and the number one complaint they all have is that they have a few in the class that are just rotten kids that make educating challenging and downright impossible. The good kids suffer, the bad kids win in ruling the classroom. The administration does not back them to get those few bad apples out of the mix, hold those parents responsible and get on with teaching the core subjects. Instead they throw a new “teaching curriculum” at them to try to intercept the ill-behavior of a few.
I will be teaching my children “gender diversity” when it is appropriate and I will be using a realistic approach instead of felt boards filled with hermaphrodite amphibians and reptiles to pled my case. I know that 99.9% of my friends and circle of influence will be doing the same. Early elementary years is not the place or forum. I expect my kids to be taught reading, writing, and arithmetic and be in a setting that reinforces respect for authority figures.
It appears my choice to be sending my kids to Catholic school (even if it means I have to work two jobs to do it) will be in the cards for our family and we are not even Catholic. It is known the Catholic school system knows how to produce competing test scores, reinforce respect and moral code, and demand parent involvement on a budget grossly less than what the public schools require.
Come on America, let’s get involved on the future of our kid’s education and support the educators do what they went to school to do; teach these kids how to achieve academic greatness! Especially since we are paying for it greatly in both tax dollars and competing with the rest of the world for economic security.
Being Accountable: Where Does the Line Start or End?
Posted in blog, Blogger, Current Events, News, Politics, Soapbox, Social Issues, Uncategorized, tagged conservatives, federal funding, James O'Keefe, Juan Williams, liberals, NPR, racial comments, Ron Schiller, tax dolalrs, Tea Party, Vivian Schiller on March 10, 2011| 4 Comments »
This morning my neighbor and I went on our walk and the subject of NPR’s big brouhaha of management shake down came up. To bring up to speed about the current event, NPR fired contributing journalist Juan Williams for saying he was uncomfortable boarding a plane with a Muslim on it, when he was on FOX news. James O’Keefe, a conservative activist, recently did an undercover sting on one of the execs, Schiller, no relation to the CEO Vivian Schiller, said that the tea party are racists Christian fanatics and that NPR does not really need the federal funding it gets from the feds. Vivian Schiller stepped down because the board pretty much told her either she was fired or she had to resign and executive Ron Schiller was fired.
First off did they not fire Juan Williams for “racist” comments on another network? Isn’t it what is good for the goose is good for the gander? I really don’t care what was said about the tea party or Juan’s issue with getting on a plane with Muslims. What I care about, and what I think NPR cared about, was Ron Schiller getting caught with his pants down on tape saying that NPR does not need federal funding. He is one of the faces of NPR and even if he believes that, he is accountable to the board of directors and those that sign his paycheck to have and edit button on his pie hole, he just had a huge wake up call. I feel NPR did the right thing.
Now, let’s get real here. Anyone that listens to NPR on a daily basis, knows that NPR leans more to the social left so being targeted by a conservative activists because it is funded by the tax payers on where they really stand on issues is not suprising and they should know that as well.
I don’t like shady operations, I like everything out on the table and seeing everyone’s cards. However we live in a society where both sides of the political spectrum do pretty outrageous things to prove or make a point and the conservative activist group found their golden nugget of opportunity and now we are dealing with the emotional fall out of that act.
I see that many are outraged that NPR fired these two executives and a journalist for saying and doing things that are not “socially/politically correct”. I say good for NPR. These people were representatives for NPR and getting paid very well to be that face of NPR and there should be consequences to be in that role stating extreme opinions and speaking off the record about financial standings of that company. Luckily for NPR President Obama is going to protect its funding despite this hiccup of diarrhea of the executive pie hole. Yet, I do ask the question if NPR can really afford to be on the air without the federal dollars, then why are we not taking the money back and applying it to other areas of need? Just a thought to ponder on.
The question I have for you fellow bloggers is the what was asked me today. Where is the line crossed when you are accountable of what you say and do even if it is off the record and in a casual environment?
My answer is that if you have a level of authority or a face of a “thing” you are accountable for everything you say and do on and off the record. You are being compensated accordingly to be that face and it is a 24 hour job. If you don’t want that responsibility, then step down. I think the consequences that NPR handed out were fair.
Read Full Post »