The question I have is what is the end game of all this madness? I keep hearing this mantra from people I know, the media, celebrities and political figures say, ” Buildings and property and can be replaced, but lives cannot.” As I watched so many cities, local and across the nation, being destroyed, the depravity is unconscionable and feels beyond counterproductive to what this is all about. None of it makes sense.
For the first time in my lifetime, I saw a nation completely come together and condemn a heinous act of police officers towards another human being, a citizen, a black man. There was no debate. It was crystal clear the evil that is happening. The conversation of change was gaining momentum by leaps and bounds. People of all walks of life went out to support change through peaceful protesting. The leaders of communities even gave latitude to vent. Then it turned dark. All the momentum of unity was snuffed out and the narrative changed to this insane mantra of supporting the destruction of our communities in the name of protesting.
In just a matter of days we are back screaming at each other, afraid of each other and hating each other. I don’t agree with the idea that destroying a city or a community drives a point and will avenge a heinous history of unfair treatment of our citizens of color. It has not been productive and effective in the past, in fact it made things worse. It incites something so far from where this started. We are still in throws of a community economic nightmare of a pandemic and now our communities look like a war zone by the hands of our own citizens. These buildings and property were jobs, livelihoods, dreams and security. These action could be the final KO to so many.
So I ask those that keep saying that buildings and property can be rebuilt, what is the goal? Is it to completely bring the US to our knees with the hope when the smoke clears, all racism and hate is gone? Is it about making citizens pay for injustice or feel the pain of what people of color feel? What is the justification and support for this? Because before this happened we were on the track towards waking up and wiping the sleep of complacency from our eyes. There was a second of hope. There was this moment of thought that even though we could not bring back George Floyd, we could make his name be something powerfully good for our country and start the real healing. Now, I fear that moment has gone and I am not sure what our future brings.
*Apparently it took a pandemic and the US being destroyed due to racial injustice to bring me back to the Pie Hole. Glad to be back writing, sad on the reasons.
Being Accountable: Where Does the Line Start or End?
Posted in blog, Blogger, Current Events, News, Politics, Soapbox, Social Issues, Uncategorized, tagged conservatives, federal funding, James O'Keefe, Juan Williams, liberals, NPR, racial comments, Ron Schiller, tax dolalrs, Tea Party, Vivian Schiller on March 10, 2011| 4 Comments »
This morning my neighbor and I went on our walk and the subject of NPR’s big brouhaha of management shake down came up. To bring up to speed about the current event, NPR fired contributing journalist Juan Williams for saying he was uncomfortable boarding a plane with a Muslim on it, when he was on FOX news. James O’Keefe, a conservative activist, recently did an undercover sting on one of the execs, Schiller, no relation to the CEO Vivian Schiller, said that the tea party are racists Christian fanatics and that NPR does not really need the federal funding it gets from the feds. Vivian Schiller stepped down because the board pretty much told her either she was fired or she had to resign and executive Ron Schiller was fired.
First off did they not fire Juan Williams for “racist” comments on another network? Isn’t it what is good for the goose is good for the gander? I really don’t care what was said about the tea party or Juan’s issue with getting on a plane with Muslims. What I care about, and what I think NPR cared about, was Ron Schiller getting caught with his pants down on tape saying that NPR does not need federal funding. He is one of the faces of NPR and even if he believes that, he is accountable to the board of directors and those that sign his paycheck to have and edit button on his pie hole, he just had a huge wake up call. I feel NPR did the right thing.
Now, let’s get real here. Anyone that listens to NPR on a daily basis, knows that NPR leans more to the social left so being targeted by a conservative activists because it is funded by the tax payers on where they really stand on issues is not suprising and they should know that as well.
I don’t like shady operations, I like everything out on the table and seeing everyone’s cards. However we live in a society where both sides of the political spectrum do pretty outrageous things to prove or make a point and the conservative activist group found their golden nugget of opportunity and now we are dealing with the emotional fall out of that act.
I see that many are outraged that NPR fired these two executives and a journalist for saying and doing things that are not “socially/politically correct”. I say good for NPR. These people were representatives for NPR and getting paid very well to be that face of NPR and there should be consequences to be in that role stating extreme opinions and speaking off the record about financial standings of that company. Luckily for NPR President Obama is going to protect its funding despite this hiccup of diarrhea of the executive pie hole. Yet, I do ask the question if NPR can really afford to be on the air without the federal dollars, then why are we not taking the money back and applying it to other areas of need? Just a thought to ponder on.
The question I have for you fellow bloggers is the what was asked me today. Where is the line crossed when you are accountable of what you say and do even if it is off the record and in a casual environment?
My answer is that if you have a level of authority or a face of a “thing” you are accountable for everything you say and do on and off the record. You are being compensated accordingly to be that face and it is a 24 hour job. If you don’t want that responsibility, then step down. I think the consequences that NPR handed out were fair.
Read Full Post »